1. Historical background
From the middle of the 9th century the Arab-Byzantine fight over the dominance in Asia Minor were for the first time connected to the harsh religious policy of the Byzantine Empire against the heresies. More specifically, in the frame of a strict orthodox policy enforced after the final restoration of the icons (March 843), the persecutions against the Paulicians were intensified; they were consequently forced to move towards the eastern side of the Arab-Byzantine frontier, in the region of Upper Euphrates, seeking security in the Arab lands. The Arab emir of Melitene ‘Amr al-Aqta’ finally ceded the the area north of Melitene, where they settled as an autonomous political and religious community, which was under the protection of the Arabs, in exchange for the Paulicians’ military services. Under this alliance, the Paulicians organized, from 843 onwards, raids against the Byzantine Empire, sometimes supporting the Arab troops and sometimes acting by themselves. Through these raids they gradually strengthened in terms of military, economic and political power of their state, rendering it a noteworthy adversary of the Empire.
The military activity of the Paulicians reached its peak when their leader was Chrysocheir (863-872), in a period in which the Arab, occupied with their internal quarrels caused by the plots inside the court of the Abbasids, were unable to organize any attack to the west. Before 869 Chrysocheir made raids in Asia Minor and reached up to Nikomedeia, Nicaea and Ephesus.
In order to face the immediate threat against the Byzantine territory, emperor Basileios I sent an embassy to Tephrike in 869, led by Petros Sikeliotes, which negotiated for nine months the signing of a peace treaty with the Paulicians. Finally, the embassy only managed to exchange prisoners, since Chrysocheir demanded, according to the Byzantine sources, by the Byzantine emperor to put the whole of Asia Minor under the control of the Paulicians. This forced Basil I to turn all his attention to the eastern border and to lead himself, in the spring of 871, a campaign against Tefrike, capital of the state of the Paulicians. This campaign was not successful and the emperor himself was nearly captured by the Paulicians. Encouraged by the failure of Basil I the Paulicians campaigned in 972, led by Chrysocheir, against the Byzantine territory, aiming once more to strengthen their position in the area of Asia Minor.1
2. Beginning and outcome of the campaign
In 872 the leader of the Paulicians Chrysocheir left Tefrike in order to make a campaign against the Byzantine Empire. With his troops he advanced until Ankara2 and the area of Kommata, that is between Ankara and the lake Tatta (today Tuz Golu) in southern Galatia, which he pillaged extensively. Next, having gained rich loot from the Byzantine lands, he took the road back to his lands, following the road which led from Ankara to Sevasteia via Tabia.3
Whereas the Paulicians raided Galatia, Emperor Basil I was in Constantinople. Right after he heard of the event, he ordered his son-in-law and domestikos of the scholae Christophoros4 to follow Chrysocheir as he was returning to Tephrike.5 The Byzantine troops reached at Siboron (today Karamadara) at the moment Chrysocheir’s camp was a bit more to the east, at Agranes (near today Muşalem Kale). From there Christophoros ordered the strategoi of the themes of Armeniakon and Charsianon to follow the Paulicians until Bathys Ryax (today passage of Kalınırmak) in northern Cappadocia, west of Sevasteia and to inform him whether Chrysocheir was about to sent troops against the themes of Armeniakoi or Charsianon. The Paulicians had already camped in Bathys Ryax, when the generals (strategoi) of Armeniakon and Charsianon arrived at night with their troops on the forested hill of Zogoloenos, above the camp of the Paulicians. There, taking advantage of the warlike enthusiasm of their troopers,6 they finally made an attack just before sunrise, notwithstanding the fact that the domestikos of the scholae Christophoros had ordered them to return without engaging the Paulicians. In the battle that followed the Paulicians were routed and the Byzantine forcers persecuted them in a distance of thirty miles towards the northeast, until the hill called Konstantinou Vounos (it is probably identified with Yildiz Dagi)7 near Sevasteia, killing many of them. During this pursuit Chrysocheir was also killed and his head was sent to Emperor Basil I in Constantinople.8
3. Consequences of the campaign
The most important event which took place during the 872 campaign of the leader of the Paulicians Chrysocheir against the Byzantine lands of Asia Minor was his battle with the Byzantine troops at Bathys Ryax. The formers not only did not allow the Paulicians to fulfil the goal of their campaign, that is the strengthening of their presence in the area of Asia Minor, but also led them to an absolute defeat, during which their military forces suffered severe losses and their leader was mortally wounded.
The death of Chrysocheir triggered great disturbance in the state of the Paulicians and brought about its rapid weakening, something which gave Basil I the chance to immediately proceed in a more dynamic campaign against the Paulicians, but also their Arab allies.9 The climax, concerning the Paulicians, of all this military effort was the fall and destruction of their capital Tephrike, a few years later, in the spring/summer of 87810 or in the summer of 879.11 With the sack of Tefrike by the Byzantines, the Paulicians’ state was finally destroyed and the military threat they presented for the Byzantine Empire was neutralized. However, Paulicians continued to exist as a religious sect, since there is information for its survival during the 10th and 11th centuries.
1. Haldon, J. F., The Byzantine Wars (Stroud 2001), p. 85, dates the campaign of Chrysocheir and his defeat at Bathys Ryax in the year 878. 2. Foss, C., «Late Antique and Byzantine Ankara», Dumbarton Oaks Papers 31 (1977), p. 80, reports that the Paulicians conquered Ankara. This information is not, however, to be found at any source. 3. Hild, F.-Restle, M., Kappadokien (Kappadokia, Charsianon, Sebasteia und Lykandos) (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 2, Wien 1981), p. 81. 4. According to Treadgold, W. T., A History of the Byzantine State and Society (Stanford 1997), p. 457, the emperor Basileios I sent the domesticus of the scholae Christoforos to face the Paulicians because he did not want to undertake the risk of a second campaign against them. 5. The events which took place from now on are described in a contradictory manner in the Byzantine sources. Here we follow the reconstruction suggested by Lemerle, P., “L’histoire des Pauliciens d’Asie Mineure d’ apres les sources greques”, Travaux et Memoires 5 (1973), p. 103, with which Hild, F. – Restle, M., Kappadokien (Kappadokia, Charsianon, Sebasteia und Lykandos) (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 2, Wien 1981), p. 81, Belke, K. – Restle, M., Galatien und Lykaonien (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 4, Wien 1984), p. 68, and Treadgold, W. T., A History of the Byzantine State and Society (Stanford 1997), p. 457 agree. On the other hand, Vasiliev, A. A., Byzance et les Arabes, 2: La dynastie macedonienne (867-959) (Corpus Bruxellense Historiae Byzantinae 2/2, Bruxelles 1962), p. 34-35, reports that the domestikos of the scholae Christoforos achieved an important victory against the Paulicians, conquered and destroyed their capital Tefrike. The leader of the Paulicians Chrysocheir managed to escape and Christoforos continued his pursuit, until they clashed at Vathys Ryakas. This version is apparently accepted by Ostrogorsky, G., Geschichte des byzantinischen Staates, transl. Παναγόπουλος, Ι., Ιστορία του βυζαντινού κράτους 2 (Αθήνα 1989) (first edition in German, Munchen 1963), p. 113. 6. Byzantine sources mention that the troops started arguing with each other about which of the two themes was the bravest. 7. Hild, F. – Restle, M., Kappadokien (Kappadokia, Charsianon, Sebasteia und Lykandos) (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 2, Wien 1981), p. 81. 8. Byzantine sources [Bekker, I. (ed.), Theophanes Continuatus (CSHB, Bonn 1838), pp. 272-276; Lesmuller-Werner, A. – Thurn, I. (ed.), Iosephi Genessi Regum Libri Quattuor (CFHB 14, Berlin-New York 1978), pp. 86-88; Thurn, I. (ed.), Ioannis Skylitzae Synopsis Historiarum (CFHB 5, Berlin-New York 1973), pp. 138-140] mention that a Byzantine soldier who personally knew Chrysocher, because he had lived as a prisoner in Tephrike for some time, was the one who gave the mortal blow to the leader of the Paulicians. 9. Already in 873 Basil I campaigned to the east and conquered Sozopetra (Zapetra) and Samosata (Arsamosata), without, however, managing in conquering Melitene, which was the primal aim of his campaign. At the same time he attacked many forts of the Paulicians successfully. 10. This dating has been suggested by Lemerle, P., «L’histoire des Pauliciens d’Asie Mineure d’ apres les sources greques», Travaux et Memoires 5 (1973), p. 108, and was followed by many modern scholars, such as Hild, F. – Hellenkemper, H., Kilikien und Isaurien (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 5, Wien 1990), p. 51. Belke, K. – Restle, M., Galatien und Lykaonien (Tabula Imperii Byzantini 4, Wien 1984), p. 68, date the capture of Tefrike by the Byzantines most probably in 878. Older scholars like Vasiliev, A. A., Byzance et les Arabes, 2: La dynastie macedonienne (867-959) (Corpus Bruxellense Historiae Byzantinae 2/2, Bruxelles 1962), p. 32-42, place the event in 872. 11. Treadgold, W. T., A History of the Byzantine State and Society (Stanford 1997), p. 458.
|
|
|