1. Strabo, 14.1.2 and 2.29. Tabula Peutingeriana, Segm. IX, Miller, K. (edit.), Itineraria Romana (Stuttgart 1916), p. 719. The coins showed that Metropolis was a city of Ionia and not of Lydia, as Ptolemy (5.2.17) and Stephanus of Byzantium believed. See Meriç, R., Metropolis in Ionien: Ergebnisse einer Survey-Unternehmung in den Jahren 1972-1975 (Königstein/T. 1982), pp. 1-2. 2. Meriç, R., Metropolis in Ionien: Ergebnisse einer Survey-Unternehmung in den Jahren 1972-1975 (Königstein/T. 1982), pp. 3-5. 3. Meriç, R., Metropolis in Ionien: Ergebnisse einer Survey-Unternehmung in den Jahren 1972-1975 (Königstein/T. 1982), p. 2, 17; Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp.18, 149. 4. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 29-31. 5. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 35-37. 6. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 41-42. 7. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 20, 23, 45-47, 50-51. 8. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 47-48. 9. Plinius, NH 5.31. Appian (Mithrad. 48) makes no mention of Metropolis, although he reports some Mesopolites. 10. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 66-67. 11. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), p. 74. 12. Honigmann, E. (edit.), Le Synekdémos d’Hiéroklès et l’opuscule géographique de Georges de Chypre (Corpus Bruxellense Historiae Byzantinae, Forma Imperii Btzantini, Fasciculus I, Bruxelles 1939), p. 22 (660.9); Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 76-79, 113. 13. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), p. 79: he believes that the Turkish name Torbalı resulted from the word ‘Metropolis’. 14. Strabo, 14.1.15. Today the city’s ruins are surrounded by olives and figs. Meriç, R., Metropolis in Ionien: Ergebnisse einer Survey-Unternehmung in den Jahren 1972-1975 (Königstein/T. 1982), pp. 7-9; Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 15, 22. 15. Meriç, R., Metropolis in Ionien: Ergebnisse einer Survey-Unternehmung in den Jahren 1972-1975 (Königstein/T. 1982), p. 19; Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 111-112, 121 (the existence of the Agora is reported in the resolution of Apollonius). 16. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 15, 23, 49-51. 17. Excavations in Ephesus started towards the late 19th century. This explains the interest of ustrian researchers in the wider area and, as a result, the ruins of Metropolis. Joseph Keil was the next one who described what he saw following field research. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 13-15. 18. Today the theatre is under reconstruction: Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), p. 98. 19. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), p. 98 believes that it was not a private house but a public meeting place, for the building found very near the theatre and the representations on the mosaic floor are reminiscent of the cult of Dionysus. 20. It seated about 350 people. The bouleuterion of Priene 500-640, while those of Ephesus and Miletus, two definitely larger cities, seated 1400-1500 people. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 115-121. 21. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 123-124: it seems that wealthy citizens offered money for the construction of public buildings. 22. Meriç, R., Metropolis: city of the Mother Goddess (Istanbul 2004), pp. 133-135. |